


USERS OPERATORS
│ │
▼ ▼
need privacy have bandwidth
│ │
└──────► HOP NETWORK ◄──────────┘
│
┌─────────┼─────────┐
▼ ▼ ▼
multi-hop proof of revenue
routing bandwidth sharing
| area | details | status |
|---|---|---|
| iOS + macOS | native Swift client with WireGuard tunneling, auto-connect, multi-hop selection | shipped |
| Windows | Electron-based client with system tray, split tunneling | shipped |
| Android | Kotlin client with always-on VPN, battery optimization | shipped |
| Linux | CLI + GUI client for power users and node operators | shipped |
| node infra | distributed relay network with auto-discovery, health checks, geographic load balancing | shipped |
| brand + website | full identity system, marketing site, blog, documentation | shipped |
| proof of bandwidth | EigenLayer AVS design for verifiable bandwidth proofs and operator compensation | designed |
| lesson | detail |
|---|---|
| distributed teams need rhythm | 5 people across 5 time zones only works with daily async standups, weekly syncs, and ruthless written documentation. slack threads are not documentation. |
| GTM for infra is different | consumer VPN marketing is a race to the bottom. our best growth came from crypto-native communities who understood decentralization, not from traditional VPN comparison sites. |
| role | location |
|---|---|
| CEO / product (me) | Singapore |
| CTO | China |
| design | UK |
| community | Nigeria |
| backend | US |
| dimension | score | note |
|---|---|---|
| execution speed | strong | zero to 5-platform MVP in 8 months with a 5-person team |
| team leadership | strong | built and managed a globally distributed team with no attrition |
| fundraising | adequate | raised ~$200K pre-seed but needed more to compete against ExpressVPN/NordVPN-scale distribution |
| market timing | weak | launched when market sentiment had turned against infra projects |
| knowing when to move on | strong | recognized the timing gap and pivoted to a higher-impact role |